Americans are Not Engaged At Work. Is that a Problem?

A new poll from Gallup out today looks at whether Americans consider themselves engaged at work and breaks it down by education level. Here are the results:Workplace EngagementI’m not actually that surprised by this data. It means an entire 20% of our workforce doesn’t care whatsoever about their jobs – I almost find that lower than expected. Lots of people perform jobs that they don’t particularly care about and do them just to make a living.

But is the fact that nearly a sixth of college educated workers and 14% of workers with a postgraduate degree are actively disengaged at their job a problem? Actually, contrary to popular belief, it may not be.

A study from Leadership IQ a few months ago found that in 42% of companies, the lowest performing workers were the most engaged employees. The reason for this is unclear, but it’s important to remember when looking at the Gallup poll above. Just because a fifth of the workforce is actively disengage from their work, it doesn’t mean they’re subpar or poor performing workers. In fact, some of the best worker’s in the country are actively disengaged and some of the worst workers are engaged.

Does that mean that firms should care less about how much their employees care about their company? No. It just means that level of engagement is not a good way to evaluate worker performance. A firm would certainly rather hire a high-performing engaged worker than a high-performing disengaged one. Even if the employees’ performance is identical, an engaged worker will likely be happier in the office and more likely to raise the performance of their colleagues. But don’t necessarily assume a disengaged worker is a poor performer. The evidence is still unclear.

The Zimmerman Trial and Race

Margaret Carlson and Ramesh Ponnuru have a short online chat that is transcribed at Bloomberg that mostly covers Liz Cheney’s announcement that she’s challenging incumbent Republican Senator Mike Enzi in a primary, but it also briefly touches on the Zimmerman case. Here’s Carlson:

Reverse the parties in the trial: Martin is following Zimmerman. Zimmerman reacts and knocks Martin to the ground. Martin fears for his life and shoots Zimmerman. Does Martin get off? Not on your life.

I feel like I’ve heard this a lot the past couple of days. If Martin were white and Zimmerman were black, there’s no way Zimmerman would have been found “not guilty,” but I don’t understand where this belief is coming from.

Now, that’s not to say that race didn’t play a major role in this case. Would Zimmerman have called the police and followed Martin if he were white? Unclear, but race almost certainly played a role in Zimmerman’s decision-making that night. From listening to Juror B37’s interview with Anderson Cooper, it’s clear that she found the defendant’s witnesses much more credible, partially because she could more easily relate to them. Juror B37 and Rachel Jeantel, the prosecution’s star witness, come from different backgrounds and different cultures. That played a part in who Juror B37 found credible and impacted the verdict.

But that doesn’t change the (lack of ) evidence in the case:

  • Police advised Zimmerman not to follow Martin, but did not tell Zimmerman to stay in his car. The dispatcher testified that he can’t give direct orders for liability reasons.
    .
  • An eye-witness said that Martin was on top of Zimmerman punching him.
    .
  • Zimmerman had a broken nose, bloody face and other minor injuries when police arrived.
    .
  • It’s unclear who the voice screaming in the 911 phone call is. Zimmerman’s family says its Zimmerman. Martin’s family says its Martin. Independent analysts aren’t sure.

The evidence is enough to foster reasonable doubt that Zimmerman acted in self-defense. If Martin were white and Zimmerman black, I don’t see how a jury could have found him guilty with that evidence. There just isn’t nearly enough evidence there to convict. Maybe a jury that decided based on racial stereotypes would not believe a word of Zimmerman’s story, but even so, an appeals court would almost certainly have overturned it.

Once again, this isn’t to say that race didn’t play a role in the trial. It isn’t to say that laws that allow such a tragedy to happen and a killer to walk to free are acceptable.

It isn’t to say anything more about the case than that the evidence was murky and no sane jury could have found Zimmerman guilty, no matter if he was white, black or purple.