I meant to comment on this Monday, but didn’t have time so I’m a few days late in agreeing with every other American that NBC has completely ruined the Olympics thus far. The station’s coverage has been nothing short of despicable. The biggest, brightest international event of the year (of the two years) and NBC has looted every last cent out of it.
Their online streaming has been brutal with streams going down constantly and advertisements popping up at the most inconvenient moments. For the best events, NBC won’t even show them live, waiting for prime time instead. That means all of us sports fan are forced to watch on a miserable stream, many times missing the event because of it. Even worse is when a commercial comes on right at the peak moment. I can’t begin to say how outrageous and utterly appalling their coverage has been.
Over at Grantland, Shane Ryan went on a rant like the rest of us on Monday:
But we are living in the age of the spoiler. People are going to find out the results if they’re around the Internet, television, or other humans. They just are. And if they don’t want to know? They’re going to avoid everything, including NBC stations. So, my question: How does it change anything if you broadcast the events live in the afternoon?? (emphasis Shane’s) The people who watch prime time are still going to watch prime time. They’re ALREADY avoiding TV, presumably while at work, and it wouldn’t change anything to throw the rest of us a bone and put the swimming on CNBC. I mean, they even announce the results on the NBC news show that leads into the prime-time coverage! Even the rest of NBC isn’t avoiding spoilers! AHHHH THIS RAGE IS GOING TO KILL ME! I should probably just give up and light my TV on fire, right?
While I can’t be sure of this, but I think NBC makes more money off advertisements by showing the event on TV just at night than twice. If NBC showed it twice, the large chunk of us that would watch it live on CNBC would not tune in at night. The ad revenue would be split between the live CNBC showing and the prime time NBC one. Certainly, the NBC advertisements would be worth less than they are now and CNBC would receive greater ad revenue from showing it live.
However, I hypothesize that NBC receives greater revenue from showing it all in prime time. Why? Because a lot of us are watching twice: once during work on our crappy little streams that fail constantly and again in brilliant HD with American announcers while laying on our coaches. That means that NBC is getting revenue from those internet ads and from the NBC prime time showing, much more than they would receive if they showed the events twice on TV. I think that’s just how the math worked out. Putting all the viewers together at one time was just more economical for NBC.
Now, it’s still an extremely slimy move. It’s the Olympics. NBC should have just sucked up the loss. In fact, if they had covered it well, they could have gained regular viewers for their other shows, but nope, instead they chose the greedy route. Well, the station has rightfully taken a huge amount of backlash for their coverage and if anything, will lose viewers. That’s entirely deserved, but it doesn’t make it any better for the rest of us who are continually frustrated by this pathetic coverage.
6 thoughts on “NBC’s Olympics Coverage: A Disaster”
The only way I can sit through this year’s Olympics is with my DVR. I learned from a Dish coworker that my new Hopper had over 2,000 hours of recording pace, so now I just check the schedule at work, set the DVR from my Phone (Dish Remote Access app) and flip through it when I get home. Prime Time Anytime automatically records it for me, and I can fast forward through all the junk in between the events. Gold medal to Dish seriously!
Reblogged this on El Noticiero de Alvarez Galloso.
excellent points alreogthet, you just gained a new reader. What might you suggest in regards to your submit that you just made some days in the past? Any sure?
RÃ©ponse Ã HF: Vous oubliez – comme toute la presse d’ailleurs – que cet abattement de 10% est plafonnÃ© Ã 3 660 â‚¬ de base, ce qui procure une Ã©conomie d’impÃ´t nettement moindre, mais dont on peut effectivement discuter le principe, tout comme d’ailleurs les avantages accordÃ©s aux journalistes ou aux pilotes de ligne , avec des forfaits particuliÃ¨rement gÃ©nÃ©reux.Les frais rÃ©els pour tout le monde, pourquoi pas, Ã commencer par nos parlementaires…demandez-leur donc!
Hiya very nice web site!! Guy .. Excellent .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your web site and take the feeds alsoÂ¡KI am glad to seek out a lot of useful info here in the submit, we need work out more strategies on this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .