Home > NBA > Did Brand Betray The Clippers?

Did Brand Betray The Clippers?

I know this post is a couple days late, but I think its worth writing about anyways. So here’s the story. After verbally agreeing to a deal with the Los Angeles Clippers, Elton Brand turned the other way and signed a five-year deal worth approximately $80 million with the Philadelphia 76ers. This took the Clippersby shock and deeply hurt the organization, which has been crippled by bad luck and poor support for their entire history. Now the questions is: Did Brand betray the Clippers? Even more so, should players take home-town discounts or go to where the money is best?  Should players feel some responsibility to their teams or after the contracts expire, should they be completely separated from their former team? Is it a business or a game?

Brand is just one of many big time players who are expected to stay with their team for no apparent reason. Why should superstar players be attached to their particular team? In Brand’s case, it is different, because he had already agreed to a contract with the Clippers. The Clips seemed to have locked up Brand and felt content that they could finally compete in the tough Western Conference. Yet, Brand turned around and signed a lucrative deal with the 76ers. The Clippers weren’t offering maximum money to the big man, something they thought wouldn’t be the breaking point in the deal. They thought they were going to get a hometown discount and be able to keep Brand while also using some extra money to sign Baron Davis. Well they signed Davis, accommodating one of Brand’s wishes: to build a winning team. Now all Brand had to do was sign on the dotted line. Los Angeles wasn’t offering the maximum salary and though Brand seemed okay with that at first, he wasn’t okay with it in the end. So was it fair for Elton Brand to suddenly shock the Clippers and sign with the 76ers?

The short answer: Yes. The long answer: No. The right answer: I don’t know. Basketball, like every other professional sport, is a business and players, like employees, must make decisions that are best for themselves. That decision is almost definitely going to be to take the extra money, so in that way, Brand did not betray the Clippers, but made the best decision for himself. However, sports aren’t exactly like every other business. The employees of sports, players, become icons for their respective cities and they are idolized by thousands of people. They make millions of dollars and play a game for a living. Though the 76ers’ deal was more lucrative than the Clippers’ offer, Brand would still have made an extraordinary amount of money with the Clippers. So, should Brand be able to walk out on a city that finally felt like it could compete for a championship without feeling guilty? The extra money from the 76ersmay be nice, but is it enough to justify leaving a team and a city which had finally thought they would have a winning team. For a split second there, Clippers’ fans thought that with Brand and Davis, they had a contending team for the first time in franchise history. Brand let down every Los Angeles Clippers’ fan when he chose Philadelphia and bolted for the extra cash. Was it unexpected? Yes, but it shouldn’t have been. Superstar players leave teams for extra money all the time and Clippers’ fans were just ignorant for believing that Brand was an anomaly. It is a business. It is a game. Brand made the right decision for himself, but was it necessary? Does that decision justify smashing the hopes of every Clippers’ fan?

I don’t know. As a fan, I want my favorite players to feel responsible to my favorite team. I want then to be willing to take a home-town discount and to still play their best. If I were a player though, I would want fans to realize that sports are a business and that I need to make a decision that is best for me, not my fans. I am a fan and I am not a player, so I agree with the first argument, but I absolutely see the sustenance of the second argument. Which argument is correct? I don’t know. Tell me what you think. Should a player feel compelled to resign with his team for less money, thus helping the team win? Or should that player take the most lucrative contract available without feeling any guilt or remorse for leaving his former team?

Advertisements
Categories: NBA
  1. July 15, 2008 at 12:59 pm

    Yeah, it’s kind of a betrayal. This story reminds me Carlos Boozer a few years ago, when he gave his word to Cleveland, and finally signed a more lucrative contract with Utah. Just business…

  2. Travis
    July 15, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    Yeah, he betrayed them. I don’t remember but I believe that Carlos Boozer was an restricted free agent I think. Didn’t the Cavaliers have 7 days to match the offer?

  3. July 15, 2008 at 10:50 pm

    Boozer is an interesting topic. His betrayal was even worse than Brand’s betrayal. The Cavaliers had an option on Boozer for $700,000 but decided to give Boozer more money because they realized he was worth more. Thus, the Cavs declined the option and negotiated a new contract with him. Well, Boozer nodded his head and shook hands through the whole thing and then when the Cavs officially declined the option, he bolted for more money. I’d say that is worse than Brand.

  1. August 24, 2008 at 1:15 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: